creative class, GCI, South Africa

Creativity, growth and development – where does SA rank?

We all know that South Africa faces significant challenges in low economic growth rates and high levels of unemployment, poverty and inequality. Recently the National Planning Commission produced a comprehensive diagnostic overview of the challenges and possible solutions (check out their cool Vision 2030 video here). In the Budget speech the Minister of Finance proposed large increases in infrastructure spending and industrial development measures.
Recently I have come across a different view of the possible drivers of economic growth and development in the form of the Global Creativity Index (GCI), compiled by the Martin Prosperity Institute in the U.S. It builds on Richard Florida’s work about the creative class and they argue that the GCI is a different way to look at issues of jobs, wages, inequality and sustainable prosperity: What you measure affects what you do. If we have the wrong metrics, we will strive for the wrong things”.
The Global Creativity Index evaluates and ranks 82 nations on Technology, Talent, and Tolerance. The technology index is broad assessment of the technological and innovative capabilities and from Schumpeter to the growth theorists economists have emphasised the importance of technology for growth. The CGI uses the standard educational attainment measure of human capital, but also includes the share of a country’s workforce in high-skill, high wage Creative Class jobs. That is the share of workers in the fields of science, technology, and engineering; business, management and finance; design and architecture; arts, culture, entertainment, and media; law, healthcare, and education. The argument is that these occupations, rather than university degrees, provide a more accurate measure of the key skills that comprise human capital. Finally, the ability to attract both talent and technology depends on openness to new ideas and openness to people. The tolerance index is as a combination of two variables, based on Gallup surveys of openness to ethnic and racial minorities and openness to gays and lesbians.
The full report is available here, so I just want to focus on South Africa’s scores. The table shows the measures and South Africa’s index rank.
Technology
Talent
Tolerance
R&D spending to GDP
34
Educational attainment
65
Openness to minorities
7
STEM researchers per capita
46
Creative class occupations
48
Open to gay community
21
Patents per capita
32
Technology index ranking
45/75
Talent index ranking
68/82
Tolerance index ranking
15/81

The above numbers clearly show that human capital challenges facing South Africa. We rank low in terms of the educational attainment and proportion of researchers. The creative class share 21.71 of employment is 21 per cent. Overall, South Africa has a Global Creativity Index score of 0.459 and ranks 45th of 82. This is below the emerging economies of central and eastern Europe, but above, Brazil, Chile and India (50th). China ranks 58th on the index.

The following graphs show the relationship between the GCI scores and other metrics of growth and development. The GCI score is a good predictor of South Africa’s economic output and Global Competitiveness Index score. However, in terms of entrepreneurship, HDI, happiness and inequality South Africa performs worse than the GCI score would predict.
  
Overall, I thinks this tells a familiar study from a different perspective: education and training matters if a country aims to pursue high-skilled, high-wage growth in a globalised economy. Maybe we need more private schools for the poor? Maybe we need more bad jobs? I would be interested to see how different places in South Africa would stack up in a Local Creativity Index.
 
Advertisements

One thought on “Creativity, growth and development – where does SA rank?

  1. Interesting! One wonders where South Africa is on the continuum of human capital needs….do we need masses of creative people or masses of well educated people ? Or perhaps just a clump (20%?) of internationally competitive creative/highly educated people. Goes against much if what I normally believe, but worth thinking about I think

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s